A Companion to Plutarch

A better half to Plutarch deals a large survey of the well-known historian and biographer; a coherent, entire, and chic presentation of Plutarch’s idea and impact

 

  • Constitutes the 1st survey of its sort, a unified and obtainable advisor that gives a finished dialogue of all significant points of Plutarch’s oeuvre
  • Provides crucial heritage details on Plutarch’s international, together with his personal circle of influential acquaintances (Greek and Roman), his travels, his political task, and his kin with Trajan and different emperors
  • Offers contextualizing history, the literary and cultural info that make clear the various primary facets of Plutarch’s thought
  • Surveys the ideologically an important reception of the Greek Classical interval in Plutarch’s writings
  • Follows the currents of modern severe scholarship, discussing perennial pursuits, and delving into themes and works no longer previously given severe attention

Show description

Quick preview of A Companion to Plutarch PDF

Similar Ancient Greece books

The Oresteia: Agamemnon; The Libation Bearers; The Eumenides

Within the Oresteia Aeschylus addressed the bloody chain of homicide and revenge in the royal relations of Argos. As they flow from darkness to gentle, from rage to self-governance, from primitive ritual to civilized establishment, their spirit of fight and regeneration turns into an enduring track of social gathering.

Socrates: A Man for Our Times

“Spectacular . . . A pride to learn. ”—The Wall road Journal From bestselling biographer and historian Paul Johnson, an excellent portrait of Socrates, the founder of philosophyIn his hugely acclaimed variety, historian Paul Johnson masterfully disentangles centuries of scarce assets to provide a riveting account of Socrates, who's frequently hailed because the most crucial philosopher of all time.

Eros and Greek Athletics

Historical Greek athletics provide us a transparent window on many vital points of old tradition, a few of that have precise parallels with sleek activities and their position in our society. historic athletics have been heavily attached with faith, the formation of younger women and men of their gender roles, and the development of sexuality.

The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens

The coming of the Sophists in Athens in the course of the 5th century B. C. used to be a big highbrow occasion, for they introduced with them a brand new approach to instructing based on rhetoric and impressive doctrines which broke clear of culture. during this booklet de Romilly investigates the explanations for the preliminary luck of the Sophists and the response opposed to them, within the context of the tradition and civilization of classical Athens.

Additional resources for A Companion to Plutarch

Show sample text content

Eds. (1988). The query of “Eclecticism”: reviews in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley. Erler, M. (1994). “Epikur, Die Schule Epikurs, Lukrez,” in H. Flashar (ed. ), Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, vol. four, Die Hellenistische Philosophie. Basel and Stuttgart: 29–490. Erler, M. (2009). “Epicureanism within the Roman Empire,” in J. Warren (ed. ), The Cambridge significant other to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 46–64. Ferguson, F. (1990). “Epicureanism less than the Roman Empire,” ANRW II. 36. four: 2257–2327. Flacelière, R. (1959). “Plutarque et l’épicurisme,” in Epicurea in memoriam Hectoris Bignone. Genoa: 197–215. Frede, M. (1999). “Epilogue,” in okay. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield (eds. ), The Cambridge historical past of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 771–797. Gosling, J. , and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982). The Greeks on excitement. Oxford. Hershbell, J. (1992). “Plutarch and Epicureanism,” ANRW II. 36. five: 3353–3383. Karamanolis, G. E. (2010). “Plutarch,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/fall2010/entries/plutarch/ (accessed may perhaps 28, 2013). Kechagia, E. (2011). Plutarch opposed to Colotes: A Lesson in heritage of Philosophy. Oxford. Purinton, J. S. (1993). “Epicurus at the telos,” Phronesis 38: 281–320. Roskam, G. (2006–2007). “Plutarch as a resource for Epicurean Philosophy: one other point of his Nachleben,” Ploutarchos n. s. four: 67–81. Roskam, G. (2007a). dwell left out (Λάθε βιώσας): at the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine. Leiden. Roskam, G. (2007b). A observation on Plutarch’s De Latenter Vivendo. Leuven. Roskam, G. (2009). Plutarch’s Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum: An Interpretation with statement. Leuven. Sedley, D. N. (1989). “Philosophical Allegiance within the Greco-Roman World,” in M. Griffin and J. Barnes (eds. ), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 97–119. 0002024006. INDD 119 9/18/2013 8:29:35 AM 120 Eleni Kechagia-Ovseiko Sharples, R. W. (2010). Peripatetic Philosophy, two hundred bc to advert two hundred: An advent and choice of Fragments in Translation. Cambridge. Trapp, M. (2007). Philosophy within the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot. Warren, J. (2011). “Pleasure, Plutarch’s Non posse, and Plato’s Republic,” CQ sixty one. 1: 278–293. Westman, R. (1955). Plutarch gegen Kolotes. Seine Schrift “Adversus Kolotem” als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle. Helsinki. Zacher, okay. D. (1982). Plutarchs Kritik an der Lustlehre Epikurs. Ein Kommentar zu Non Posse Suaviter Vivi Secundum Epicurum: Kap. 1–8. Königstein. consultant to additional interpreting assorted elements of Plutarch’s angle towards Epicureanism were mentioned by means of a couple of students over the the final fifty years: Flacelière (1959) set the scene via arguing for a improvement in Plutarch’s perspective to the Epicureans from light attractiveness in his early years to outright hostility on the finish of his existence. Hershbell (1992) presents an summary of the presence of Epicureanism and Epicureans in Plutarch’s writings and discusses quite often phrases the most objections Plutarch raised opposed to the philosophy of the backyard, displaying, contra Flacelière, that there's no proof of evolution in Plutarch’s angle.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.59 of 5 – based on 18 votes