Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age

Hellenistic philosophers and students laid the principles upon which Western culture built analytical grammar, linguistics, philosophy of language and different disciplines. construction at the pioneering paintings of Plato, Aristotle and prior thinkers, they constructed a variety of theories in regards to the nature and starting place of language. Ten essays discover the traditional theories, their philosophical adequacy, and their effect on later thinkers from Augustine during the heart a while.

Show description

Quick preview of Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age PDF

Best Ancient Greece books

The Oresteia: Agamemnon; The Libation Bearers; The Eumenides

Within the Oresteia Aeschylus addressed the bloody chain of homicide and revenge in the royal relations of Argos. As they circulation from darkness to gentle, from rage to self-governance, from primitive ritual to civilized establishment, their spirit of fight and regeneration turns into a permanent music of get together.

Socrates: A Man for Our Times

“Spectacular . . . A pride to learn. ”—The Wall highway Journal From bestselling biographer and historian Paul Johnson, an excellent portrait of Socrates, the founder of philosophyIn his hugely acclaimed type, historian Paul Johnson masterfully disentangles centuries of scarce resources to provide a riveting account of Socrates, who's frequently hailed because the most vital philosopher of all time.

Eros and Greek Athletics

Old Greek athletics provide us a transparent window on many very important facets of historic tradition, a few of that have particular parallels with sleek activities and their position in our society. historic athletics have been heavily hooked up with faith, the formation of younger women and men of their gender roles, and the development of sexuality.

The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens

The arriving of the Sophists in Athens in the midst of the 5th century B. C. used to be an enormous highbrow occasion, for they introduced with them a brand new approach to instructing based on rhetoric and impressive doctrines which broke clear of culture. during this publication de Romilly investigates the explanations for the preliminary good fortune of the Sophists and the response opposed to them, within the context of the tradition and civilization of classical Athens.

Additional info for Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age

Show sample text content

29 The Stoics don't appear to make 26 27 28 29 either one of those issues, particularly the second one, will be learn as an immediate retort to Diodorus Cronus, who had pointed out all that means with speaker’s which means, and therefore denied the opportunity of ambiguity (see lengthy and Sedley 1987: vol. i, 227–30). in spite of the fact that, if my normal thesis concerning the Stoics’ shut interpreting of the Cratylus is correct, the 2 issues can also be handled as a rejection of Hermogenes i and ii. For convincing arguments about the constrained position the Stoics assigned to onomatopoetics as a precept of etymology, see Allen this quantity. The imprint of the Sophist at the Stoics’ therapy of lekta because the meanings of declarative sentences is excellently sketched through Sedley 1996: 97–8. become aware of, even though, that this discussion, not like the Cratylus, has not anything to assert approximately that means transcending its linguistic expression. See lengthy and Sedley 1987: vol. ii, word on 31c. Stoic linguistics forty nine any large use of etymology in constructing the principles in their method, and, very strikingly, the subject isn't really even pointed out by means of Diogenes Laertius in his therapy in their dialectic (7. 43–83), that is our so much complete therapy of this a part of their philosophy. They function, relatively, through invoking standards of fact and via arguments, for you to developing a coherent set of actual lekta about the nature of items. The Stoics have been essentially attracted to etymology as a back-up to their theology, believing that their very own clinical perspectives concerning the gods have been adumbrated within the historical names assigned to those beings. For the sake of simplicity, i've got spoken of the Stoics during this paper as if they have been a monolithic team. That, in fact, used to be faraway from the case. i don't imagine that the earliest Stoics sat down with the Cratylus, and appropriated and changed it in toto. What occurred, I recommend, was once even more piecemeal. They have been at first drawn to it via its etymologising and maybe due to its concentrate on Heraclitus. They have been additionally inspired, at an early level, via Socrates’ formal naturalism, and its potentiality for connecting which means, in no matter what language it really is expressed, with the signification of truth. a lot later most likely, as their grammatical pursuits built, they grew to become to the discussion for its proposals approximately observe formation. Stoic proof on that subject, as i've got pointed out, is meagre, and not anything back is expounded approximately it via Diogenes Laertius in his doxography in their theories. less than the impact of Hellenistic grammarians, and doubtless challenged by means of the revival of curiosity in Plato’s doctrines, a few Stoic or Stoics, I conjecture, studied the discussion as an entire, reading it with no irony as a major pioneering enterprise in linguistics. the end result, if this is often correct, may well clarify the set of responses i've got tried to chart during this paper. au g u s t i n e d e d i a l e c t i c a five The Cratylus was once a fruitful source on language for Stoic philosophers to imagine with, following, as they so frequently did, traces of inquiry pursued by way of Plato’s Socrates.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.44 of 5 – based on 18 votes